To the content
5 . 2019

The study of the raw milk contamination by bacteria of the genus Campylobacter using traditional microbiological methods and quantitative PCR assay

Abstract

Gastroenterocolitis caused by Campylobacter bacteria are the most common acute infectious zoonotic foodborne diseases. One of the important factors for the transmission of infection is contaminated dairy products, so the assessment of contamination of raw milk with Campylobacter is necessary to develop effective measures to suppress the growth of the pathogen and ensure the safety of products.

The aim of the study was to assess the microbial characteristics of raw milk samples and the nature of their contamination with thermophilic bacteria of the Campylobacter genus.

Material and methods. A total of 60 samples of raw milk from the central regions of the Russian Federation and 48 experimentally infected samples of raw milk were studied. To assess the microbial contamination of milk, the number of extraneous microflora was determined, including coliform bacteria (CFB). The identification and quantification of bacteria of the genus Campylobacter was carried out by cultural methods in comparison with quantitative PCR assay. For PCR, primers were used that detected the species-specific sequence of C. jejuni 16s rRNA, the presence of the cytotoxic toxin gene cdtB and the invasion gene ciaB.

Results and discussion. A significant part of the samples of raw milk (31.6%) was characterized by high levels of microbial contamination exceeding 106 CFU/cm3. Gram-negative bacteria were the dominant type of bacterial microflora, their levels were comparable with the detected values of the total number of microorganisms. Coliform bacteria were found in all studied samples, and their content in 90% of the samples reached 105 CFU/cm3, and in some samples - 107 CFU/cm3. Campylobacter spp. detection rate in raw milk was 8.3%, and their number ranged from 0.1 to 100 CFU/cm3 (average 2.0x10 CFU/cm3). The isolated strains of campylobacters were identified as a C. jejuni species. In the study of the microbial background of the examined samples of raw milk, a comparative analysis of their contamination by campylobacters by rti-PCR was simultaneously carried out. The majority of samples (over 60%) were positive for the presence of 16s rRNA genomic sequence, and they were characterized by the highest values of total bacterial contamination and the amount of coliforms. The use of a multi-primer approach (simultaneous testing for the presence of 16s rRNA and the gene of cytoletal toxin cdtB C. jejuni) reduced the number of positive cases of Campylobacter DNA detection to 16.6%, which suggests a greater informative value of the cdtB gene for the detection of viable, including uncultivated cells. An indicative assessment of the results in a quantitative format showed levels of 104-1065 genomic equivalents of the DNA in 1 cm3, suggesting the possible presence of viable Campylobacter cells in the tested probes with a significantly greater frequency than that established by cultural method.

Conclusion. At low levels of Campylobacter contamination the microbiological methods do not provide reliable detection of the pathogen due to massive contamination of raw milk by extraneous microflora. Campylobacter spp. were detected by the culture method in 8.3% of cases, while the use of multi-primer PCR assay with cdtB and ciaB genes can double the detection of C. jejuni in raw milk samples.

Keywords:Campylobacter spp., raw milk, PCR assay, microbial contamination

For citation: Efimochkina N.R., Stetsenko V.V., Markova Yu.M., Bykova I.B., Pichugina T.V., Polyanina A.S., Minaeva L.P., Sheveleva S.A. The study of the raw milk contamination by bacteria of the genus Campylobacter using traditional microbiological methods and quantitative PCR assay. Voprosy pitaniia [Problems of Nutrition]. 2019; 88 (5): 17-23. doi: 10.24411/0042-8833-2019-10049 (in Russian)

References

1. Vidal A.B., Davies R.H., Rodgers J.D., Ridley A., Clifton-Hadley F. 7. Epidemiology and control of Campylobacter in modern broiler production. In: Sheppard S.K. (ed.). Campylobacter Ecology and Evolution. Norfolk, 2014: 287-313.

2. Thepault A., Meric G., Rivoal K., Pascoe B., Mageiros L., Touzain F., et al. Genome-wide identification of host-segregating epidemiological markers for source attribution in Campylobacter jejuni. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2017; 83 (7): e03085-16. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03085-16

3. Cody A.J., Bray J.E., Jolley K.A., McCarthy N.D., Maiden M.C.J. Core genomemultilocus sequence typing scheme for stable, comparative analyses of Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli human disease isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 2017; 55 (7): 2086-97. URL: https:// doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00080-17

4. Revez J., Zhang J., Schott T., Kivisto R., Rossi M., Hanninen M.-L. Genomic variation between Campylobacter jejuni isolates associated with milk-borne-disease outbreaks. J Clin Microbiol. 2014; 52 (8): 2782-6. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00931-14

5. Sheveleva S.A., Shurysheva Zh.N., Piskareva I.I. Contamination of food by bacteria of the genus Campylobacter. Voprosy pitaniia [Problems of Nutrition]. 2006; 75 (6): 38-43. (in Russian)

6. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). Analysis of the baseline survey on the prevalence of Campylobacter in broiler batches and of Campylobacter and Salmonella on broiler carcasses in the EU, 2008, Part A: Campylobacter and Salmonella prevalence estimates. EFSA J. 2010; 8. URL: https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1503

7. Guerin M.T., Sir C., Sargeant J.M., Waddell L., O’Connor A.M., Wills R.W., et al. The change in prevalence of Campylobacter on chicken carcasses during processing: a systematic review. Poult Sci. 2010; 89 (5): 1070-84.

8. Efimochkina N.R. Evaluation of the role of Campylobacter spp. in the occurrence of foodborne diseases and modern methods to detect the pathogen. Voprosy pitaniia [Problems of Nutrition]. 2015; 84 (6): 5-18. (in Russian)

9. Efimochkina N.R. Food Microbiology and Modern Methods of Detection of Foodborne Pathogens. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo RAMN, 2013: 517 p. (in Russian)

10. Humphrey T., O’Brien S., Madsen M. Campylobacters as zoonotic pathogens: a food production perspective. Int J Food Microbiol. 2007; 117 (3): 237-57.

11. Jayarao B.M. WHO Surveillance Program for Control of Food Borne Infections and Intoxications in Europe. Newsletter, 2001; 75.

12. Artursson K., Schelin J., Lambertz S.T., Hansson I., Engvall E.O. Foodborne pathogens in unpasteurized milk in Sweden. Int J Food Microbiol. 2018; 284: 120-7. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodmicro.2018.05.015

13. Del Collo L.P., Karns J.S., Biswas B., Lombard J.E., Haley B.J., Kristensen R.C., et al. Prevalence, antimicrobial resistance, and molecular characterization of Campylobacter spp. in bulk tank milk and milk filters from US dairies. J Dairy Sci. 2016; 100: 3470-9. URL: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-12084

All articles in our journal are distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0 license)

SCImago Journal & Country Rank
Scopus CiteScore
CHIEF EDITOR
CHIEF EDITOR
Viktor A. Tutelyan
Full Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Scientific Director of the Federal Research Centre of Nutrition, Biotechnology and Food Safety (Moscow, Russia)

Journals of «GEOTAR-Media»